We now have a report that the Pearlz variance application won't be heard by the BZA (Board of Zoning Appeals) until May 5. More when we get it.
MEANTIME: One question for us and for the City: If in fact Pearlz has been serving in violation of zoning law, what penalty (if any) is there for such an infraction?
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
(I post this as a comment because it is my opinion and thus should not be seen in the regular body of the blog.)
ReplyDeleteMy view is simple: The FQNA has a singular purpose-- to work for the improvement of the neighborhood.
Thus, while some may believe that a local merchant shouldn't be disadvantaged vis a vis his competitors and that therefore we should support a compromise, I contend that OUR organzation is NOT where that argument should be heard.
Our organization should fight this variance application as something that can be deleterious to the welfare of the neighborhood. Let the Board of Zoning Appeals hash it out.
So, if you're tallying votes, mine is clearcut.